9 Essential Types of Performance Appraisals Explained

Performance appraisals are crucial for organizations to measure their employees' performance. At the same time, the employees need to understand what the business expects from their roles, their career prospects in their current organization, how their performance impacts the overall industry, and their probable areas of improvement. 

Performance appraisals also help the managers and leadership team reevaluate their team's objectives if they do not align with the organization. Also, different performance appraisal systems help identify employees' weak points. Their managers and leaders can then decide to mentor them accordingly. 

In this blog, we shall be discussing the different types of performance appraisal systems and understand their relevance. 

What is a Performance Appraisal?

Performance appraisals are a systemic process measuring employee performance against a preset list of criteria. Different performance appraisals assess an employee's performance according to various criteria. You'll often hear it as a performance review, employee appraisal, or performance evaluation. 

An efficient approach to recognizing employee performance is crucial for effectively managing employees and creating a positive work culture. A good strategy is unbiased, which helps managers better evaluate job performance. At the same time, it allows the employees to assess their strengths and weaknesses for further growth and development. 

Is There Any Relevance of Choosing the Right Type?

HR professionals often find themselves troubled by the question - “What are the different performance appraisal methods and what suits my company best?” 

Today, the market has different types of performance appraisal systems. Each one caters to specific needs. The primary motive driving the performance appraisal process is generating reports for analyzing the employee's productivity and their valued contributions to the organization. Different types of performance appraisals are possible depending on the employees' working modes. 

While Check-ins are essential for healthy two-way conversations, 360-degree feedback helps managers and leaders understand how their employees collaborate with their peers. 

There is something called a Narrative Appraisal system where the managers write essays applauding the contributions made by them. On the other hand, Competency Assessments help managers evaluate whether the employee has all the essential skills for performing a job. Project-based reviews help review how an employee collaborates with the rest of the teammates. 

Traditional Types of Performance Appraisal

Traditional types of performance appraisal methods are still in practice. Here are some key ones and how they help the organization recognize their talents.  

Ranking Method

This was the first and the most preferred traditional method of performance appraisal. Under this process, the employees are rated from highest to lowest based on their performance during the evaluation period. This type of performance appraisal involves comparing employees directly against each other based on specific performance criteria, such as productivity, leadership, or teamwork. 

Advantages:

• Clear Distinction of Performance Levels: It highlights the top performers and identifies the low performers, making it easier to decide on promotions, rewards, or training needs.
• Competitive Environment: Encourages a competitive culture, motivating employees to perform better.

Disadvantages:

• Lack of Detailed Feedback: It doesn’t provide detailed insights into individual strengths or areas needing improvement.
• Potential for Unhealthy Competition: This can lead to rivalry and decreased collaboration among team members.

Best Used When:

• Organizations have small teams with similar job roles.
• Management wants a straightforward method to differentiate performance levels.

Example Scenario:
In a sales team, employees can be ranked based on quarterly revenue generation. The top 20% receive incentives, while those at the bottom are given performance improvement plans.

Grading Method

There are a lot of grading parameters possible under the Grading Method. One of them is assessing your employees based on their behavior or projects assigned. Employees receive grades such as A, B, and C, or ratings like Excellent, Good, Average, and Poor. The final output of this assessment decides where your employee stands concerning the organization. 

Advantages:

• Clear Expectations: Employees know exactly what is expected to achieve each grade.
• Consistency and Standardization: Promotes a uniform evaluation system, reducing bias.

Disadvantages:

• Lacks Individualization: It may not account for individual circumstances or challenges.
• Limited Feedback: Doesn’t provide detailed feedback on how to improve.

Best Used When:

• There is a need to evaluate a large workforce quickly and uniformly.
• The job roles are standardized with clear expectations.

Example Scenario:
In a manufacturing unit, workers are graded based on productivity, product quality, and adherence to safety protocols. This helps in identifying consistent performers and those needing skill enhancement.

Checklist Method

In Evaluation Checklist methods, the HR professionals can prepare a summary checklist. This could be a managerial review, peer review, or self-evaluation checklist and involves managers or HR professionals using a list of statements or questions to evaluate employee performance. The evaluator simply marks 'Yes' or 'No' against each statement, making it an efficient way to track performance attributes.

Advantages:

• Easy to Administer: Saves time and is straightforward for both the evaluator and the employee.
• Consistent Evaluation: Maintains a standardized evaluation across different departments.

Disadvantages:

• Subjectivity and Bias: The interpretation of statements can be subjective, leading to inconsistent ratings.
• Limited Feedback: This does not provide detailed insights into performance issues.

Best Used When:

• Evaluating basic job responsibilities and tasks.
• Organizations need quick evaluations with minimal explanations.

Example Scenario:
In a customer service team, a checklist could include statements like "Handles customer complaints effectively" or "Meets daily call targets." This ensures basic performance metrics are consistently met.

Forced Distribution Method

This method forces evaluators to distribute employees into fixed performance categories such as top 10%, middle 70%, and bottom 20%. This ensures a balanced performance curve within the organization.

Advantages:

• Encourages Differentiation: Prevents rating inflation and forces managers to distinguish between high and low performers.
• Performance-Based Decisions: Facilitates objective decisions on promotions, raises, or terminations.

Disadvantages:

• Can Demotivate Employees: Those in the lower category may feel demotivated, even if they are performing adequately.
• Not Always Fair: Not all teams perform equally, leading to unfair evaluations.

Best Used When:

• Organizations need to identify top performers for promotions or leadership pipelines.
• Ensuring performance differentiation in a large workforce.

Example Scenario:
In a large retail chain, employees are categorized into top performers, average performers, and underperformers based on quarterly sales targets. This helps in identifying potential leaders for store management roles.

Critical Incident Method

This method involves managers recording specific instances of employee behavior that are particularly effective or ineffective. These critical incidents are then used to evaluate overall performance.

Advantages:

• Detailed Feedback: Provides context-specific feedback and highlights behavioral patterns.
• Objective Evaluation: Reduces biases by focusing on documented incidents.

Disadvantages:

• Time-Consuming: Requires continuous observation and diligent record-keeping.
• Subjectivity in Incident Selection: The choice of incidents can be subjective.

Best Used When:

• Evaluating roles where behavior significantly impacts performance, such as customer service or leadership roles.
• Identifying patterns of behavior over a period.

Example Scenario:
In a healthcare setting, a nurse’s critical incident record could include positive behaviors like handling emergency cases efficiently or negative incidents like failure to follow safety protocols. This allows for targeted training and development.

Essay Method

In this method, supervisors write a detailed narrative describing an employee’s strengths, weaknesses, and overall contribution to the organization. It provides qualitative insights that are not captured by quantitative rating systems.

Advantages:

• Detailed and Personalized Feedback: Offers a holistic view of an employee’s performance.
• Flexible Evaluation: Allows managers to provide context and examples.

Disadvantages:

• Subjective and Time-Consuming: Highly dependent on the evaluator’s writing style and observation skills.
• Lacks Standardization: Different evaluators may have varied writing styles, leading to inconsistency.

Best Used When:

• Evaluating managerial or leadership roles where qualitative feedback is valuable.
• Providing developmental feedback during annual appraisals.

Example Scenario:
For a project manager, the essay could discuss leadership qualities, problem-solving abilities, and contributions to team morale, offering a comprehensive performance review.

Paired Comparison Method

This involves comparing each employee against every other employee in a specific team or department on various performance criteria. Scores are calculated to determine the overall ranking.

Advantages:

• Relative Performance Measurement: Provides a clear distinction of performance levels among employees.
• Reduces Bias: Evaluators are less likely to give average ratings to everyone.

Disadvantages:

• Cumbersome for Large Teams: The number of comparisons increases exponentially with team size.
• Competitive Environment: This may lead to unhealthy competition among team members.

Best Used When:

• Teams are small, and roles are similar, allowing for effective comparison.
• Organizations need to differentiate top performers for promotions or rewards.

Example Scenario:
In a startup’s sales team, each salesperson is compared with peers on metrics like closing rate, revenue generated, and client retention. This helps identify the most effective sales strategies and high performers.

Why Conventional Kinds of Performance Appraisal Fail to Work in Modern Times?

Traditional types of performance appraisal methods often fail in modern working setups as they tend to be infrequent. They are overly reliant on receiving retrospective feedback. They also lack real-time insights and are falling back in addressing the dynamics of modern workplace setups. 

Modern Approaches to Performance Appraisal

Modern work cultures are choosing different types of rating scales in performance appraisals. Here are some key ones among them -

360-Degree Feedback 

360-Degree Feedback involves collecting performance data from multiple sources, including peers, subordinates, supervisors, and even clients. It provides a holistic view of an employee’s skills, behavior, and performance by incorporating diverse perspectives and is one of the best performance appraisal systems that can help HR professionals see the bigger picture.

Advantages:

• Comprehensive View: Offers well-rounded feedback from multiple viewpoints, ensuring a balanced assessment.
• Promotes Self-Awareness: Employees gain insights into how they are perceived by others, encouraging self-improvement.
• Fosters Team Collaboration: By involving peers, it enhances team dynamics and mutual respect.

Disadvantages:

• Complex and Time-Consuming: Gathering and analyzing feedback from multiple sources can be time-intensive.
• Potential Bias and Inconsistency: Feedback may be influenced by personal biases or lack of objectivity from peers.

Best Used When:

• Evaluating leadership roles or collaborative team environments.
• Organizations seek comprehensive insights into interpersonal skills and leadership qualities.

Example Scenario:
In a technology company, a product manager receives feedback from cross-functional teams, including engineers, designers, and marketing specialists. This helps them understand their communication effectiveness and project management skills.

Management by Objectives (MBO)

Management by Objectives is a goal-setting process where employees and managers collaboratively set specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) objectives. Performance is then evaluated based on the achievement of these objectives. 

Reviewing performance by objectives is the next best type of performance appraisal. The sales department mainly relies on this method, wherein the employees are assessed based on performance metrics. There are plenty of scopes for dialogue between the manager and their subordinates. 

Advantages:

• Alignment with Organizational Goals: Ensures that individual objectives are aligned with the company’s strategic goals.
• Clarity and Motivation: Employees understand their responsibilities clearly, enhancing motivation and focus.
• Encourages Two-Way Communication: Promotes regular discussions between managers and employees, fostering a culture of feedback.

Disadvantages:

• Time-Consuming: Setting and reviewing goals require dedicated time and effort from both parties.
• Rigid Targets: Fixed objectives may not adapt to changing business needs.

Best Used When:

• Roles are result-oriented with clear deliverables, such as sales, marketing, or product development.
• Organizations prioritize goal alignment and strategic planning.

Example Scenario:
A sales team sets quarterly revenue targets in collaboration with the sales manager. Performance is reviewed based on the achievement of these targets, leading to strategic adjustments and personalized coaching sessions.

Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS)

Amongst the top 5 types of performance appraisals, you also have something called BARS. The behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS) is a behavior-measuring grading scale for assessing whether the employee understands the work culture. 

BARS combines quantitative ratings with qualitative descriptions, assessing employee performance based on specific behavioral examples. It is designed to reduce bias and provide more accurate performance measurements.

Advantages:

• Clear Expectations and Objectivity: Describes specific behaviors required for each rating, reducing ambiguity and subjectivity.
• Consistent Evaluation: Standardized criteria ensure consistent evaluations across teams and departments.

Disadvantages:

• Time-Consuming Development: Developing behaviorally anchored scales requires significant effort and expertise.
• Limited Flexibility: May not adapt well to rapidly changing roles or job functions.

Best Used When:

• Evaluating roles with clearly defined competencies and behaviors, such as customer service or technical support.
• Organizations require consistent and objective performance evaluations.

Example Scenario:
In a call center, BARS is used to evaluate communication skills by defining behaviors for ratings like "Excellent" (e.g., empathetic communication and proactive issue resolution) and "Poor" (e.g., dismissive tone and unresolved queries).

Continuous Performance Management

Continuous Performance Management focuses on ongoing feedback, real-time goal setting, and regular check-ins. It shifts away from annual appraisals to frequent conversations, enabling real-time adjustments and continuous development.

Advantages:

• Real-Time Feedback: Issues are addressed promptly, enhancing productivity and employee engagement.
• Agility and Adaptability: Goals and feedback are continuously updated to reflect changing priorities.
• Employee Development: Focuses on continuous learning and growth rather than one-time evaluations.

Disadvantages:

• Requires Managerial Commitment: Managers need to invest time in regular check-ins and feedback sessions.
• Overload of Feedback: Employees may feel overwhelmed if feedback is not constructive or balanced.

Best Used When:

• The organization is agile and operates in a rapidly changing environment.
• Roles require adaptability and continuous learning, such as technology or creative industries.

Example Scenario:
In a digital marketing agency, managers hold bi-weekly check-ins to review campaign progress, provide feedback, and adjust goals based on client feedback. This helps in maintaining agility and meeting dynamic client expectations.

{{cta-1}}

OKR (Objectives and Key Results)

OKR is a goal-setting framework used to define and track objectives and their outcomes. Objectives define what needs to be achieved, while Key Results are measurable steps to track the achievement. It promotes alignment and transparency across teams.

Advantages:

• Focus and Alignment: Ensures that all team members are working towards the same strategic objectives.
• Transparency and Accountability: Objectives and key results are typically visible to the entire organization, promoting accountability.
• Encourages Ambitious Goals: OKRs inspire employees to aim for challenging, stretch goals.

Disadvantages:

• Risk of Unrealistic Goals: Ambitious OKRs can sometimes be demotivating if not achieved.
• Requires Cultural Adoption: Successful implementation requires a culture of transparency and accountability.

Best Used When:

• Organizations prioritize strategic alignment and measurable outcomes.
• Teams are cross-functional and collaborate towards common objectives.

Example Scenario:
At Klaar, the product development team sets quarterly OKRs such as "Improve product adoption by 30% by enhancing user onboarding experiences," with measurable key results to track progress.

Competency-Based Appraisal

This approach evaluates employees based on specific competencies required for their roles, such as communication skills, problem-solving abilities, or leadership qualities. It focuses on behavioral attributes and skill development.

Advantages:

• Skill Development: Identifies gaps and promotes targeted learning and development programs.
• Role-Specific Evaluation: Aligns evaluations with role requirements and organizational values.

Disadvantages:

• Subjectivity in Competency Definition: Defining competencies and performance standards can be subjective.
• Complex Implementation: Requires detailed frameworks and trained evaluators.

Best Used When:

• Roles require a specific set of skills or behavioral attributes, such as leadership or client-facing roles.
• Organizations aim to build a competency-driven culture.

Example Scenario:
In a consulting firm, competency-based appraisals are used to evaluate project managers on leadership, problem-solving, and client management skills. This helps identify high-potential leaders for succession planning.

Social Recognition and Feedback Platforms

These platforms encourage peer-to-peer recognition and continuous feedback through social media-style interfaces. Employees can publicly acknowledge their peers’ achievements, promoting a culture of appreciation.

Advantages:

• Employee Engagement: Boosts morale and motivation through public recognition and appreciation.
• Real-Time Feedback: Provides immediate feedback and recognition, fostering a positive workplace culture.

Disadvantages:

• Potential Popularity Bias: Employees with outgoing personalities may receive more recognition, irrespective of actual performance.
• Informality and Inconsistency: Feedback may lack structure or specificity.

Best Used When:

• Organizations aim to enhance employee engagement and morale.
• Teams are collaborative and value peer recognition.

Example Scenario:
At Klaar, employees use a social recognition platform to celebrate achievements like project completions or innovative ideas, promoting a culture of collaboration and positive reinforcement.

Specialized Types of Performance Appraisal

Besides the different performance appraisals listed above, there are some specialized types. Here are three key ones among them - 

Team-Based Appraisals

This performance appraisal system helps understand how a team performs as a whole. It is a metric for assessing whether the team is meeting its standards of expectations that the organizational leadership has set for them. Such performance appraisals help understand expectations and the team's progress towards achieving those goals, reviewing what the team has accomplished together and further. These are perfect for organizations where the individuals are involved in project-based work.

Self-Appraisals

A self-appraisal or self-assessment is a written form of evaluation that the employee performs on himself. This assessment helps the employees understand their strengths and weaknesses, consider and reevaluate how their job contributes to the organization, and reflect on how they can grow and at what pace. 

Project-Based Appraisals

A project-based appraisal is a performance appraisal type that evaluates how your employees perform or contribute to a specific assigned project. It can help identify their strengths and weaknesses. If required, future development strategies can be prioritized for employee growth.

How to Choose the Best Type of Performance Appraisal for Your Organization

Selecting the best performance appraisal system depends on the industry type and the company's size. Besides having lots of kinds of performance appraisal systems, and each one comes with its pros and cons. Here are a few parameters you can consider while choosing a performance appraisal approach. 

1. Company Size - whether your chosen system can handle the complexities of your company
2. Industry - whether your chosen system can deal with your industry 
3. Organizational Culture - whether your chosen system provides fairness, helps reduce bias, and offers less stressful reviews
4. Feedback - whether your chosen system provisions for a continued feedback approach 
5. Self-assessment - whether your chosen system allows employees to assess themselves 
6. Communication - whether your chosen system fosters a culture of transparent communication 
7. Goal Setting - whether your chosen system allows for predefining and aligning the individual and team goals with the business goals.

{{cta-2}}