Scattered context
Goals, feedback, reviews, and 1:1s lived in different places.
Customer story · Zenwork
As Zenwork scaled across teams and time zones, performance work became scattered and reactive. Klaar connected goals, reviews, 1:1s, feedback, and predictive signals into one continuous system.
What changed after Klaar.
Managers were moving between goal sheets, calendars, HRIS forms, and disconnected feedback. Goals went stale, reviews lacked day-to-day context, and coaching competed with the administrative work required to run the process.
Goals could update from the tools teams used to execute work. 1:1s, feedback, reviews, and goal signals lived together, while AI handled more of the preparation, summaries, follow-up, and risk detection.
Performance became a weekly operating rhythm instead of a periodic HR event. Managers spent less time assembling context, employees received more consistent conversations, and leaders had earlier signals on execution risk.
The change was not more process. It was connecting the context already being created and making it useful earlier.
Goals, feedback, reviews, and 1:1s lived in different places.
The system carried work signals and conversations forward together.
Leaders saw slipping goals and manager attention gaps sooner.
“Our managers saved over 10 hours each during the review cycle. It’s about better decisions and less frustration.”
Klaar gave Zenwork a way to connect intention with execution. The performance process became easier to maintain and more useful to the people actually running the business.
Security & trust
Independently audited, encrypted in transit and at rest, and permissioned to your own org structure — so nobody sees more than they should.

